100 ARCHIVES

Domesday Book


IMG NOT FOUND
British History

Earswick in the Domesday Book (1086)

Earswick is named in the Domesday Book, compiled by Norman commissioners in 1086, entered under the hundred of Bulford in Yorkshire. The survey assessed Earswick at 0.3 carucates of taxable land.

The survey records Earswick’s value at 0d in 1086. No pre-Conquest figure survives – not unusual in the North, where records were disrupted by the Harrying and by the patchy coverage of the survey.

The Domesday survey records Earswick as waste — uninhabited and unproductive. In Yorkshire, this designation most often reflects the Harrying of the North of 1069–70, when William I’s forces destroyed crops, livestock, and communities across the county to crush rebellion. Whether Earswick recovered in subsequent decades is not recorded.

IMG NOT FOUND
British History

Easby in the Domesday Book (1086)

The settlement of Easby is recorded in William I’s Domesday survey of 1086, entered under the hundred of Langbaurgh in Yorkshire. The survey assessed Easby at 0.5 carucates of taxable land.

At the time of the survey, Easby supported a recorded population of 4 villagers.

The survey records Easby’s value at 12d in 1086. No pre-Conquest figure survives – not unusual in the North, where records were disrupted by the Harrying and by the patchy coverage of the survey.

IMG NOT FOUND
British History

Easington in the Domesday Book (1086)

Easington is named in the Domesday Book, compiled by Norman commissioners in 1086, entered under the hundred of Holderness [South Hundred] in Yorkshire. The survey assessed Easington at 1 carucate of taxable land.

At the time of the survey, Easington supported a recorded population of 4 smallholders, 3 slaves.

The survey records Easington’s value at 10d in 1086. No pre-Conquest figure survives – not unusual in the North, where records were disrupted by the Harrying and by the patchy coverage of the survey.

IMG NOT FOUND
British History

Easingwold in the Domesday Book (1086)

Easingwold is named in the Domesday Book, compiled by Norman commissioners in 1086, entered under the hundred of Bulford in Yorkshire. The survey assessed Easingwold at 0.5 carucates of taxable land.

The survey records Easingwold’s value at 0d in 1086. No pre-Conquest figure survives – not unusual in the North, where records were disrupted by the Harrying and by the patchy coverage of the survey.

The Domesday survey records Easingwold as waste — uninhabited and unproductive. In Yorkshire, this designation most often reflects the Harrying of the North of 1069–70, when William I’s forces destroyed crops, livestock, and communities across the county to crush rebellion. Whether Easingwold recovered in subsequent decades is not recorded.

IMG NOT FOUND
British History

East and West Flotmanby in the Domesday Book (1086)

East and West Flotmanby appears in the Domesday Book of 1086, entered under the hundred of Torbar in Yorkshire. The survey assessed East and West Flotmanby at 4 carucates of taxable land.

At the time of the survey, East and West Flotmanby supported a recorded population of 17 villagers, 18 smallholders, 10 slaves, working 5 ploughs between them.

The survey records East and West Flotmanby’s value at 2.5 shillings in 1086. No pre-Conquest figure survives – not unusual in the North, where records were disrupted by the Harrying and by the patchy coverage of the survey.